The doctrine of States’ Rights is not something the Federal government can pick and choose at will to enforce; yes for potties and no for pot. Transgender bathrooms? Regulated marijuana? It’s a much bigger foundational American IDEA: let the states do state stuff and reserve national interests for the feds. It is the well-used path toward a smaller federal government which is the goal of many conservatives, liberals, and independents alike.
Federal pigheadedness on marijuana is a time and money waster for citizens; official speakers (Mr. Sean Spicer, just as an example) need to educate themselves on how pot and opioids interact, and understand the “cause” for opioid addiction is big pharma (and their unholy alliance with prescribing physicians):
There are even studies that show lower opioid overdoses in states that legalize medical marijuana and I will let you guess how that might work on recreational users too:
What we need is a coherent overview on the “nanny state” and how much it should work against “sin” like vice, gambling, liquor, tobacco, soda pop, etc. Mostly I believe in taxing behavior and letting those who want to engage do so at a price. Reduce taxes on good behavior. Carrot and stick, people.
States like Illinois have complicated their medical marijuana rules to the point they do not serve the deserving let alone provide the kind of relief that is hoped for by those who suffer from less stringently defined ailments like nausea from toxic cures or insomnia from mental confusion-exhaustion after a year of surgeries.
I lived through the roll-out of Washington state’s regulated marijuana and can tell you there was no sharp rise in crime but a definite upswing in state tax income. Ditto the other states who have realized there IS a difference between “natural” marijuana and the corrosive impact of engineered drugs like meth, heroin, OxyContin, Fentanyl, Propofol.
I take the position either legalize pot or criminalize alcohol: gasp! They are intoxicants that serve no other purpose than to alter body-mind chemistry. You have to tell the truth about booze to face the facts about pot. And here’s another perspective.
As for transgender bathroom rules, I like the “family bathroom” idea in public places so that people who have to exert more control for the good of themselves and others are afforded privacy. I know there is a cost involved; I know transgender is a “lightning striking” word so I wish we’d find a way to understand that bathroom services are a baseline of dignity and safety starting with the odd distinction that we expect men to pee in open troughs and women to always use private stalls. Let’s standardize on stalls for all!